| What do you have to say
about this announcement? Send your email to make |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Another
Historic sad day Announcement:
20th November 2007
Cheltenham
Racecourse Historic Announcement (577Kb PDF)
 |
| |
|
|
|
| Comments: |
 |
"so $85 million is it, as
SAJC announces preferred developer. Chicken feed
compared to what it's actually worth as open
space and could be worth as water management
area." - David |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
"first
reports say 900, now they say 1,000 three-storey
pre-fab houses are to be packed in to make this
open space go from 'special use zone' to concrete
jungle... If the SAJC sell-up then they should
get out. Declare this a NO POKIES zone." -
AZ |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
How dare they
sell off this land and allow
inappropriate energy consuming housing
development
- Margaret |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Save
Cheltenham
Under the 1961 Proclamation Cheltenham Park
Racecourse was donated in a "Will" to
the South Australian Government and Racing
Authority
The 1961 Proclamation
The donation of this land had two special
provisions
1. The land was used for the sole purpose of
Racing.
2. The land would be left as Open Space
Questions?
1. The South Australian Racing Authority do not
own this land and therefore the land is not
theirs to sell
"Cheltenham Park" "Belongs to the
People".
Observation
If I died and my will left in trust $1,000,000.00
dollars to my only child in my will, with special
provision that the child would not recieve this
amount until aged 21
Their is no possible way that this child would be
able to overturn my wish, the child could not
dispute my wishes and would have to wait until
aged 21.
Court Action
High Court Action - with the support of Mr Rod
Sawford Federal Minister and over 1200 people
whom opposing the Sale of Cheltenham at Woodville
Town Hall
If the South Australian Racing Body do not want
to race at Cheltenham anymore, they should
relinquish their rights to this land
The South Australian Government should abide to
the wishes of the deceased and leave Cheltenham
Park as open space
The People should now confiscate the land,
pitching tents, caravans, until the final
decision by the courts is made
Yours Truly
Rob - Resident and Race Horse Trainer
Email Support: |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Dear Rob,
Does it mean that if Cheltenham is no longer used
as a racecourse, there is legal recourse to
overturn the Open Space will of the Testator (if
that's the correct term), as simple as applying
to the Governor General of the day to do so?
That is what I am lead to believe.
- AZ |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
I believe that
the racing industry do not own the racecourse,
Government have no right to sign over the land,
in 1961 a deceased person left in his will land
with special restriction as suggested, racing
could use this land for racing only, whilst if
they do not want to race their anymore the
proclamation suggested the land would be left
open.
The land should be returned to the people, the
rate and tax payers
This is an act of Treason to go against a person
will, whilst the advise from Mr Conlon is crap,
their is nothing to sell whilst is Mr conlon a
lawyer "No" my advice to those whom
support keeping cheltenham is mount a legal
challenge just like the asbestos man, he won for
the people.
We should confiscate this land now imagine
building another 900 houses we dont have enough
water for the population now, whilst port
adelaide is about to be the boom suburb of the
21st and 22nd century, maybe they should shift
the city to the port like all other states which
are built on the rivers
- Rob |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|